A response to Roper's question in his post "What Made Me A Dom":
On his recent post "What Made Me a Dom", Roper asked some very interesting questions, one of which was:Anyone got any ideas what makes them tick D/s-wise, about why you are the way you are? Firstly, I don't think of myself as "D/s". I'm certainly not part of the "lifestyle". Perhaps this is because I hate labels - I find they tend towards stereotype and they are limiting. That being said, sexually I think I'm deeply submissive. Roper says that he finds most submissive women are notoriously dominant in their day-to-day lives. I definitely fall into this category. I think that a lot of men think of me as a ball-breaking bitch. Dominant is an understatement. Like everyone else, I've tried to be the person my partners wanted me to be. And, because many of the men who've been attracted to me, saw me first in my "public persona" mode, they fantasize that I am aggressive and dominant in bed. I've tried to be. I really have tried the 'ravenous tigress' thing. I can fake it pretty well, but it isn't me. As I've grown older, I've stopped trying to be that thing that men hope I am. Now, I'm going to say something that is likely to piss a lot of people off, but I am just speaking for myself - so keep your panties on. I know where my submissiveness comes from, and it isn't from a healthy place. If I'd grown up with the right balance of male and female influence - especially on my self-image - I don't think I'd be this way. Also, I think that if I hadn't grown up with a subconscious Judeo-Christian disdain for the purely physical, I probably wouldn't crave a submissive position as much as I do. I have a big, big "daddy" thing. Primarily because I didn't have one. My father was aloof, and cold, and really didn't have a lot of interest in me in any way. So I lacked that overarching benevolent masculine influence that, when present, creates women with really healthy self-images. Being submissive allows me to feel that overarching male presence, showering me with approval, guiding me with discipline, that I lacked as a child. Secondly, somewhere, deep in my subconscious, is the sense that sex and sexual pleasure is wrong. It's not just wrong, it's bad. Obviously, I don't feel that way about it intellectually, but you can tell from my stories that there's always a hesitation on my characters' part to throw themselves completely into the moment of sexual bliss without some structure of permission. Hence stories like "The Changeling". Being submissive relieves me of the responsibility for my own sexual gratification. Although I am capable of being responsible for it myself, there is always a blame or remorse that I never feel in a submissive situation. That blame or remorse is intellectual - it denies me the relief of a purely instinctual and physical experience. So, for those reasons, I am naturally submissive. That doesn't mean I'm naturally a doormat - even sexually. I would never tolerate or put up with any serious physical discomfort for very long, because the connection for me, between pleasure and pain is a tenuous one. There is a point at which pain erases any possibility of pleasure for me - that's the point I am not willing to go beyond. I think the best dominants (I know some of you are going to wonder why I don't capitalize that, but that is another post) not only recognize those particular needs and are willing to fill them, but have similar or matching drives. Something in their development, or their past makes being paternal erotic for them, makes being the orchestrator of sexual activity a turn-on. They get off on controlling the situation - and taking responsibility for it. I've been with a lot of men who were willing to do those things, but in all honesty, I've never been with anyone who actually was wired in such a way that they got off on it. They might have gotten off on the fact that I got off. But ultimately, that is not enough. It's not enough to go through the motions because you are a generous lover. It has to be at the very core of what drives your sexuality for a really good "lock and key" fit to happen. One day, hopefully before I get too old to kneel without my knees giving out, I'm going to meet that very special person: the key to my lock. Keep your fingers crossed for me. |




















Comments on "A response to Roper's question in his post "What Made Me A Dom":"
-
Collette said ... (8:40 AM) :
-
remittance_girl said ... (10:07 AM) :
-
Sadie J. said ... (1:08 PM) :
-
remittance_girl said ... (3:10 PM) :
-
Roper said ... (4:26 PM) :
-
remittance_girl said ... (6:50 PM) :
-
Amanda said ... (5:47 AM) :
-
remittance_girl said ... (7:08 AM) :
-
Dolce said ... (6:43 AM) :
post a commentThanks for sharing this. I see myself in some of your statements and you've prompted me to take a closer look at my inner dynamics. As always, you're thought-provoking.
::BLUSH::
Oh, I LOVE provoking thought. It's so much like provoking orgasm. ;-)
rg
Several of my good friends and I emerged from a super religious upbringing unscathed (majorly, at least) and sexually responsive. I'd chance to say that every one of us fits into the category of submissive, and for many of the reasons you listed. I've wondered, in fact, if there's some scientific study out there on the corrolation between rape fantasies in women and the number of times they heard "Even sexually impure thoughts are wrong" from the pulpit, parent, teacher, etc. Who knows? I'm glad that we have forums to talk about it now. That way, hopefully, we can keep aware of those sometimes nettling forces in us so that they don't bloom into anything physically dangerous, and can still discuss how jolly-damn much fun being submissive can be.
I think that an important point to keep in mind is: although how you got to be this way is interesting, you are who you are now and have the needs and drives you have.
How to address those desires responsibly, safely and constructively.
You can't re-write your past, or change those things that influenced who you became. But you can put them in the context they deserve and get on with exploring the unique thing that is you - now.
Hugs,
rg
What you say is so interesting, both about the 'absent father' syndrome, and the anti-sex guilt inculcated by religion. I don't think those are the only forces making for submissiveness, but clearly for some people they are significant. Thanks so much for your insights.
Roper
I agree with you Roper. Definitely they are not the only forces. They're simply mine.
Ironically, I wasn't brought up in a religious household at all, but my nanny was furiously catholic. I figure that must have been where I got it from.
Hugs,
rg
i also see a lot of myself in your comments regarding your own submissiveness, Rg. Not the religious part though. One of my issues is that I'm very analytical. I think ALL the time. Except when ordered not to. D/s sex is the only way to get me out of my head.
Yes... that inability to shut your brain off is a very good point! I remember a while back Bliatz did a very good post on that.
I agree - anything to stop the cacophony.
rg
I stumbled upon your blog, and Im very happy to have done so. But this specific post really spoke directly to me.
I tried to explain some of these things to my partner once. How hard it is to stop thinking, analyzing, judging, etc during sex. It took him very long to understand and me very long to stop pretending it isn't always like that. And still, no matter how much I try to accept who I am, it always feels like a failing of sort to be unable to give in to sex just for the sake of it, without being forced to submit to it in one way or another.
The irony is, this man is the key to my lock. Except that (to take a peek at the other side of the coin as well) religion, upbringing, even love and respect /stop/ him most of the time from being the way he craves to be sexually: the dominant one, the one who has full control and full responsibility, the "selfish bastard" that trully fulfills the needs and desires of both of us.
It is a tricky balance of ballast. And quite often he just castrates himself into being dominant out of generocity. But like you said, that just won't ever do.
Isn't it funny how sometimes the things that clog our subconscious both make us what we are and hinder us from really being it?
Thanks for making me think about this again.