However, I would like to moderate your sentiments with the fact that, I have never in my life fucked a man who didn’t think that women have every right to have ultimate say on what happens to their bodies. Those aren’t the men who want the law to control mine.

I never fuck the enemy.

Maybe an irreversible vasectomy is more appropriate and more humane, but at the time of commenting I wasn’t feeling terribly humane towards men that use women’s bodies against them. As for the jail time, I think this is the kind of legislation we should be proposing to highlight how ridiculous the laws that are already in place against women are.

I’m just tired and angry and I want it to stop.

I too wonder why there is no outrage from men in this.

I don’t think it is any fairer to ruin a man’s life with an unwanted pregnancy than it is to ruin a woman’s. However, I do understand that this would even up the score. Chemical castration is a little harsh, though. Don’t you think?

Personally, I think men that father unwanted pregnancies should serve 9 months of jail time on their first strike, chemical castration on the second strike, and, in the event that the mother chooses to give up the baby for adoption because she has no viable access to an abortion, these men should then have to pay child support to the state. Maybe then men (and the women that support their ideas) will start to understand how serious legislating someone’s body really is.

Abortion is thus a unique procedure; by choosing it, a woman is expressing her independence of a man (of men); isn’t this why so many men have a problem with it?