I got an email today. All it said is: “What’s with the needles?” Yup, that’s all. With a fake return address. And since I take questions seriously, because they afford me some opportunity for reflection, I’m going answer it publicly. I gather it was actually an expression of disgust at story I recently posted called “Jouissance Précoce” but I’m going to pretend it was a real question and give it a real answer.
Behind every kink, there’s a story. I’m not sure who said that. I can’t track down the quote, but I’m a little envious that it wasn’t me. It forms the basis of why I write what I write. And if every kink has a story behind it, then the story doesn’t just explain the kink; it offers you insight to the story of the whole person.
So, first I’ll admit that the story is broadly autobiographical. I don’t often write stories about myself. And it was only after reading Barthes’ “The Pleasure of the Text” and his concept of ‘Jouissance Precoce‘ (precocious ejaculation, or premature ejaculation – literally ‘undercooked’) that I decided to write it. It’s also over at my academic blog, forming part of a creative response to a piece of critical literary theory.
People begin their sexual lives much earlier than most of us are comfortable discussing in our present society, and certainly in the erotica genre, but there are ages where the chances of wires getting crossed seems to be greater. Usually in puberty or early adolescence. Sometimes, Freud would have argued, much younger. The seemingly unerotic converges with a moment of hyper-arousal and the event becomes inscribed upon the landscape of our sexualities. It might be something as innocent as a particular colour or smell. Or a song. Or the particular way someone touched you in friendship. Or something as dark as needles.
As time goes on, that node of eroticism formed by the overlapping wires accrues more and more meaning. Certainly, I wasn’t conscious of, nor did I understand the power dynamic inherent in a doctor/patient relationship. I didn’t know about Foucault’s “The Birth of the Clinic“. But instinctively, I must have read my expected role as a submissive/subordinate one. Patients are petitioners, asking for relief from an all-knowing, all-seeing physician.
Of course, I have a different view of doctors now. But in the minutes it took to live through that formative event, the instruction to lie on my side, look at the wall and stay still struck me as deeply arousing, as did the sense of exposure. The prick of the needle heightened it; symbolically, it was a penetration of a sort – my first, you could say. It wasn’t particularly painful or truly traumatic, just incredibly embarrassing. And there was the added psychological complication of tangible positive reinforcement: I desperately believed that it would instantly relieve me of my awful seasickness. And it did – or close enough. It wasn’t instant, but within the hour, I was feeling much better. I’m not a psychologist, and perhaps other more educated people might have a different reading of this. But the story is my, very subjecting telling and it comes with an admittedly highly subjective reading of the event.
In adulthood, the very few times I have allowed a lover to stick needles in me, all those early visceral reactions come back. It makes me feel deeply submissive. I sit or lie still. I get very aroused and a strong sense of impending pleasure. Interestingly enough, unlike a lot of other people who enjoy needle-play, I don’t like to watch them go in. I don’t dislike it, but it gets me off more when I don’t see it, but just feel it.
As an adult, the act takes on more meaning, because obviously, sticking needles into someone for no medical reason is a transgressive act. I don’t need medicine, the person doing it is not a doctor. They are transgressing a social norm by doing it, and that gets me off even more. I find the ‘fall of man’ – the conscious commission of an act of social disorder – as very hot indeed.
I have a number of other kinks, few of which I have located the origin for. This one just seemed ripe for exploring, both as a writer, and in terms of literary theory.
I’m pretty sure that many people didn’t find the story a turn on. But I don’t feel erotica is porn. My obligation is not to give you an orgasm, but to write about desire. Perhaps it will arouse you, perhaps it won’t. Then it’s just a written portrait of an event. Hopefully a skillfully written one.
Addendum: This post is not meant as a response to the nature vs nurture argument raging on the net at the moment. If I was pressed on the issue I’d say that, as an individual, my propensity towards towards sexual deviance in general may very well be genetically primed, and my acquisition of specific kinky fixations was a consequence of nurture.
So… got a kink? Any ideas on its origin?
For what it’s worth, I found this story to be very erotic…not necessarily because I share the kink, but because of how you wrote about it. I found it very easy to ride the emotion of the girl in the story and to experience the needle as erotic and arousing because she did, and because your descriptions of sensation and emotion were vivid enough for me to experience them sympathetically. I’ve obviously been aroused in my life, and your writing allowed me to mesh my own experience with hers just enough.
In my opinion, this is how good erotic writing should be. If a reader can only relate to it because they share a particular kink, that’s kind of lazy (on the part of the reader as well as the writer).
This is really very very interesting. I think we often forget to ask, amongst all the many questions kink provokes, where the kinks came from. I know the origin of some of mine… but I’d have to really think about some of the others.
Food for thought.
It brings up the nature vs nurture thing, doesn’t it? Although this particular kink clearly has a ‘nurture’ origin, I do have to say that I suspect my propensity to acquire kinks may be a function of ‘nature’. Because I acquired quite a number of them. I feel like I was kind of ‘primed’ to deviancy.
“it gets me off more when I don’t see it, but just feel it.” – for me this is true in a lot of the sexual/intimate acts I engage in. Though I don’t have a problem watching, I am more aroused when I am not watching. A great example is getting fucked from behind. Part of the reason I love it so much is because I am not face to face with my lover, I can’t watch what he is doing. I choose not to. I choose not to look behind me. Instead, I am heated by feeling him inside and against me. I’m sure it’s a lot more than just not watching him. I am sure I am charged by the disconnect and the primal fuck. I am lost within my own mind just feeling him pound away into my body, his fingers digging into the ample flesh of my hips, pulling me harder onto him until it feels like he’s going to split me and I really want him to. Hearing him grunt, moan, growl and yell as he thrusts into me from behind just feeds more into my lust. Hot damn.
*fans self*
It’s not often I get comments that actually get me wet. That was one of them. Thank you.
(and my response ended up being far too long. It requires a post of its own).
At first, I practiced my particular kinks simply for the experience of being kinky. I am always looking for some…activity or thought or emotion that can help me switch my perspective, become more and different than my normal.
Doing something interesting and/or pleasurable for its own sake has switched into using kink to bolster the inherent ‘difference’ I feel/see in myself as compared to others around me. Liking these things, wanting and needing them helps me to continue reveling in my difference. It helps me become more me.
All the various kinks I have come out of my intense attraction to power and control. I wield my own in my life but am drawn as to a magnet to power (and the use of that power – control) and, frankly, any person who can wield it with more precision than I. The power rolling off of them and over me, the loss of control somehow strengthens my own and at the same time gives me the solace of losing it for a time.
So, it isn’t the kink and its etiology that I find interesting but the end result of obtaining it.